Playing politics with military procurement leaves our forces with costly and aging aircraft


Dan Albas is the Conservative Get together MP for the driving of Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola. This riding involves the communities of Kelowna (certain boundaries), West Kelowna, Peachland, Summerland, Keremeos, Princeton, Merritt and Logan Lake.

Contributions published by KelownaNow reflect only the views of all those who generate them, and not necessarily these of KelownaNow or its staff members.

<who> Photo credit: File

Prime Minister Trudeau has lengthy held a company placement on the Lockheed Martin F-35 multi-purpose jet fighter aircraft.

In 2015 his promise to Canadians was crystal clear “we will not buy the F-35 stealth fighter bomber.”

PM Trudeau further mentioned the F-35 “did not work” and that “it no longer tends to make perception, if it at any time did, to have a stealth, initial-strike capacity fifth-generation fighter.”

Points improved this 7 days as the Trudeau Liberal Federal government declared that it has now made a decision that the F-35 will be the most well-liked replacement plane for the CF-18.

Negotiations will now start off to order 88 new F-35 fighter jets at a at the moment estimated price of close to $19 billion.

<who> Photo credit: 123RF

What was also pretty exciting about this Liberal conclusion was that lately produced paperwork attained less than Entry to Information uncovered the Liberal Governing administration conversation strategy to justify purchasing the F-35 was made two many years ago, in 2020.

Why was a “communications strategy” expected?

As documented by the Ottawa Citizen, it was to “justify how the federal government could obtain the F-35 even nevertheless Key Minister Justin Trudeau claimed Canada wouldn’t obtain the stealth fighter and experienced no use for it.”

What was in this communication approach?

Assistance to avoid “dealing with the direct statements from the Liberals that the F-35 would not be acquired. As a substitute, the focus was on the procurement procedure by itself.”

This is mainly what Procurement Minister Filomena Tassi did at the announcement that PM Trudeau did not attend.

This is not the first time the Liberals have played politics when it will come to changing growing older tools required by our forces.

Quite a few may possibly remember that in 1992 the Liberals also campaigned to cancel the EH-101 helicopter replacement for the growing old Sea-King helicopter.

This cancellation cost taxpayers $478 million in penalties when the Liberals cancelled the $4.8 billion EH-101 helicopter get that was to switch the ageing Sea-Kings.

Cancelling the substitute for the Sea-King did not negate the will need to swap this getting older helicopter, it only delayed it additional, and at a significantly larger cost to taxpayers.

In actuality when the exact Liberal govt, only a few many years later on announced the substitution of the Sea-King, the new helicopters arrived at an improved price tag stated to be $6.2 billion.

When that contract was ultimately signed for 28 new CH-148 Cyclone helicopters the full expense had improved extra to $7.6 billion.

Because of the numerous delays produced by this Liberal cancellation, an extra $495 million servicing agreement was necessary to keep the 55-year-old Sea-King helicopters properly in the air.

I mention all of this because taking part in politics with military services procurement does minimal far more than depart our forces with ageing, considerably less productive plane that is very highly-priced to fly.

It also drives up the eventual substitute costs to taxpayers.

My problem this 7 days:

Do you guidance the purchase of the 88 Lockheed Martin F-35 jet fighters?

Assistance nearby journalism by clicking here to make a one-time contribution or by subscribing for a modest regular charge. We appreciate your thing to consider and any contribution you can give.


Source connection