INVESTOR ALERT: Li-Cycle Holdings Corp. f/k/a Peridot Acquisition Corp. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Class Action Lawsuit – LICY –
SAN DIEGO–(Company WIRE)–The law business of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers or acquirers of Li-Cycle Holdings Corp. f/k/a Peridot Acquisition Corp. (NYSE: LICY LICY.WS) publicly traded securities concerning February 16, 2021 and March 23, 2022, equally dates inclusive (the “Class Period”) have till June 21, 2022 to request appointment as direct plaintiff in Barnish v. Li-Cycle Holdings Corp. f/k/a Peridot Acquisition Corp., No. 22-cv-02222. Commenced on April 19, 2022 in the Jap District of New York, the Li-Cycle class motion lawsuit rates Li-Cycle as effectively as selected of its major government officers with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
If you endured considerable losses and would like to provide as guide plaintiff of the Li-Cycle course action lawsuit, remember to offer your information by clicking in this article. You can also call attorney J.C. Sanchez of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Lead plaintiff motions for the Li-Cycle class action lawsuit should be filed with the courtroom no later on than June 21, 2022.
Circumstance ALLEGATIONS: Li-Cycle is the primary lithium-ion battery recycler in North The usa. On August 10, 2021, Li-Cycle merged with Peridot Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition corporation (“SPAC”) also termed a blank check business. Prior to the merger, Peridot traded on the NYSE under the ticker symbols PDAC, PDAC.U, and PDAC WS.
The Li-Cycle class action lawsuit alleges that, through the Class Interval, defendants designed bogus and deceptive statements and failed to disclose that: (i) Li-Cycle’s premier consumer, Traxys North The us LLC, is not essentially a shopper, but basically a broker giving working cash monetary to Li-Cycle although Traxys attempts to promote Li-Cycle’s merchandise to conclusion customers (ii) Li-Cycle engaged in very questionable relevant social gathering transactions (iii) Li-Cycle’s mark-to-model accounting is susceptible to abuse and gave a bogus impact of development (iv) a substantial part of Li-Cycle’s noted revenues ended up derived from merely marking up receivables on products that experienced not been offered (v) Li-Cycle’s gross margins have very likely been adverse because inception (vi) Li-Cycle will call for an extra $1 billion of funding to guidance its planned progress (which is a determine bigger than Li-Cycle lifted by way of the merger) and (vii) as a final result, defendants’ public statements were being materially phony and/or misleading at all suitable situations.
On March 24, 2022, Blue Orca Capital released a report on Li-Cycle describing Li-Cycle as “a around lethal mix of inventory marketing, laughable governance, a broken company hemorrhaging cash, and remarkably questionable Enron-like accounting.” Between other items, Blue Orca alleged that Li-Cycle’s revenues are centered on “an Enron-like mark-to-design accounting gimmick” and that “Li-Cycle diverted $529,902 in trader funds to the household . . . of its founders by way of a sequence of highly questionable related bash payments.” Blue Orca also alleged that Li-Cycle’s “cash burn off is so serious and much above earlier guidance” which “will require [Li-Cycle] to increase at minimum $1 billion . . . in massive portion by massively diluting existing shareholders.” On this news, Li-Cycle’s stock selling price fell by much more than 5%, detrimental investors.
Robbins Geller has released a devoted SPAC Endeavor Pressure to secure buyers in blank check out firms and seek redress for corporate malfeasance. Comprised of experienced litigators, investigators, and forensic accountants, the SPAC Endeavor Pressure is devoted to rooting out and prosecuting fraud on behalf of injured SPAC investors. The rise in blank look at funding poses exclusive hazards to buyers. Robbins Geller’s SPAC Undertaking Pressure represents the vanguard of making sure integrity, honesty, and justice in this speedily producing investment decision arena.
THE Direct PLAINTIFF Course of action: The Personal Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits any investor who procured Li-Cycle securities through the Course Period to look for appointment as guide plaintiff in the Li-Cycle course motion lawsuit. A lead plaintiff is usually the movant with the finest financial fascination in the reduction sought by the putative course who is also normal and adequate of the putative class. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other course members in directing the Li-Cycle class motion lawsuit. The direct plaintiff can pick a legislation firm of its selection to litigate the Li-Cycle class motion lawsuit. An investor’s ability to share in any possible potential restoration of the Li-Cycle class action lawsuit is not dependent on serving as lead plaintiff.
ABOUT ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP: Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP is 1 of the world’s leading complex class action companies representing plaintiffs in securities fraud conditions. The Firm is ranked #1 on the 2021 ISS Securities Class Motion Companies Major 50 Report for recovering virtually $2 billion for investors last yr by yourself – more than triple the amount recovered by any other plaintiffs’ agency. With 200 legal professionals in 9 workplaces, Robbins Geller’s attorneys have obtained lots of of the major securities course motion recoveries in historical past, which includes the biggest securities course motion recovery at any time – $7.2 billion – in In re Enron Corp. Sec. Litig. Remember to check out http://www.rgrdlaw.com for extra info.
Previous results do not guarantee potential results.
Expert services may perhaps be executed by lawyers in any of our offices.
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
655 W. Broadway, San Diego, CA 92101
J.C. Sanchez, 800-449-4900