Court of Appeal Rules Against Scomi Group Judicial Management Appeal


Nowadays, the Court of Appeal dismissed Scomi Group Bhd’s attraction versus the Significant Court choice dismissing its judicial management software.

As established out before, the High Court experienced dominated on two points when dismissing the judicial administration application of Scomi Team Bhd, being a stated firm.

Very first, the Significant Courtroom dominated that a stated business could not implement for judicial management. The High Courtroom dominated that a listed business would tumble in the exclusion in section 403(b) of the CA 2016: “a firm which is topic to the Funds Markets and Expert services Act 2007“.

2nd, in this scenario, a secured creditor experienced exercised its correct of veto in portion 409 of the CA 2016 to item to the judicial administration software. Scomi Team Bhd argued that the veto had to be interpreted narrowly and where by the phrase “secured creditor” experienced to still be study collectively with, basically, a secured creditor who could appoint “a receiver or receiver and manager referred to in subparagraph 408(1)(b)(ii)“.

Subsequent to the Higher Courtroom choice, Scomi Group Bhd experienced acquired a Court of Charm interim preservation get to fundamentally revive the judicial management moratorium.

With today’s selection, the Court of Attraction, in its transient oral remarks, verified the two findings of the High Court docket. In particular, this appellate choice confirms that a detailed enterprise simply cannot utilize for judicial management. There are no prepared grounds of judgment however. I will update this article with a extended case commentary when the penned grounds are issued.

The Court docket of Attractiveness selection also signifies that the interim preservation purchase preserving Scomi Group Bhd would have now fallen absent.



Resource hyperlink